Interested in knowing which web hosting provider is better when it comes to Bluehost vs Hostinger in 2020? Well, I’m going to answer just that!
I’ve talked a lot about both web hosting providers in my videos, but I’ve never done a complete Bluehost vs Hostinger analysis. Well, in this video I’m going to compare the pricing, performance, support, features and technology used for both providers. So you can decide which one works best for you. Time to jump into a Bluehost vs Hostinger review!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
TIME TABLE
Intro – 00:00
Pricing Differences – 00:30
Performance Tests – 02:09
Support Options- 04:43
Extra Features – 06:01
Recommendation – 07:37
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
PRICING
Both Hostinger and Bluehost offer cheap web hosting plans when compared to the rest of the market. However, Hostinger goes to the extreme, offering plans as cheap as $1 per month. While Bluehost charges a bit of a premium, around $3 a month for their cheapest plans. In general Hostinger services are around 50% cheaper than those of Bluehost in every tier. So, when it comes to Bluehost vs Hostinger in terms of pricing, Hostinger wins.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
PERFORMANCE TESTS
When it comes to performance Hostinger invests heavily into the newest tech and the latest architecture for their servers. They’re utilizing PHP 7.4, Litespeed servers and server side caching to increase your website loading speed quite dramatically. In the hostinger vs bluehost performance tests that I’ve done in 2020, Hostinger was more than twice as fast as Bluehost.
However, in my stability test I’ve found that Hostinger limits the max amount of users you can get on your site without slowing down quite dramatically. To keep up with the fast performance, your website (with the cheapest Hostinger plan) will only work smoothly when it’s being browsed by 20-30 people at the same time.
Bluehost can support around 50-60 users at the same time without experiencing slowdowns. When it comes to Bluehost vs Hostinger in terms of performance I would say that Hostinger is a better fit for smaller, speed oriented sites. While Bluehost works better for larger, not so much speed dependent sites.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
SUPPORT
When we’re talking about Bluehost vs Hostinger in terms of support, it’s not much of a competition. Hostinger advertises 24/7 support. However, it’s currently deactivated. You can only reach their support team via email tickets. And the live chat option is an extra paid feature, that costs around $2 a month.
At the same time, Bluehost offers 24/7 live chat support for free, phone support and email support. So, it’s not much of a comparison. Bluehost is A LOT better when it comes down to support.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
EXTRA FEATURES
While both providers are cheap, they’re jam packed with premium features that you would expect from more expensive web hosting providers. For example, Hostinger allows you to choose which data centers you want to use. This is great if you’re looking to host your website for international users, not just for US citizens.
And Bluehost offers automatic WordPress updates and a staging environment for your site. The staging environment allows you to create a copy of your site and test out all changes there.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
RECOMMENDATION
If you’re still unsure should you buy Hostinger or Bluehost think of it like this. Hostinger is the cheapest possible option that offers premium level quality and performance. However, you will be left without support. The interface is simple and beginner friendly, but it’s best if you have some prior experience.